The dilemma of providing cardioverter/defibrillator back-up for all patients with heart failure eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy
AbstractCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) achieved by biventricular pacing (CRT-P) has been proved to improve symptoms and prognosis of patients with refractory heart failure. Sudden cardiac death is quite common among patients with symptomatic heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy has been proved to effectively reduce sudden deaths in heart failure patients. Given the results of the recently published primary prevention trials and the high incidence of sudden cardiac death among CRT-P recipients, CRT combined with backup defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) seems a logical therapeutic option in patients eligible for CRT. However, the apparent beneficial effects of such an appealing combination do not alleviate the skepticism about the unselected use of CRT-D therapy. This skepticism is largely related to the high cost of this method, to the limited availability of human and financial resources and to our inability to appropriately define the selection criteria for CRT candidates, which are expected to influence the clinicians??? decisions when confronted with the dilemma of providing CRT-D therapy for all patients eligible for CRT.
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).