Oncology News / Literature Review / July-December 2019

Authors

  • E. Karatrasoglou Medical Oncologist, phD, 1st Department of Medical Oncology, “Agios Savvas” Anticancer Hospital of Athens, Greece
  • Alexandros Tzovaras AGIOS SAVVAS ANTICANCER HOSPITAL ATHENS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2015/hc.v15i1.887

Abstract

1.                 Overall survival (OS) results of a phase III randomized trial of standard-of-care therapy with or without enzalutamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304), an ANZUP-led international cooperative group trial.

Testosterone suppression (TS) is the backbone of treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Overall survival is improved by the addition of early docetaxel (DOC) or abiraterone to TS. The randomised phase 3 ENZAMET trial assessed the effects of enzalutamide (ENZA), a potent androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, versus a nonsteroidal anti-androgen (NSAA: bicalutamide, nilutamide, or flutamide) in addition to SOC in mHSPC.

Men (1125) with mHSPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive TS plus either ENZA (160 mg daily, by mouth, until clinical disease progression or prohibitive toxicity) or NSAA (conventional NSAA, by mouth until clinical disease progression or prohibitive toxicity). All participants were to receive standard background therapy with a LHRHA or surgical castration, as per standard of care. The choice of the LHRHA or surgical castration was at the discretion of the treating clinician. Randomization was stratified by: volume of disease (high vs low, according to CHAARTED); planned early DOC; planned anti-resorptive therapy, comorbidity score (ACE-27), and study site. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Subgroup analyses to assess possible modulation of the treatment effect were specified a priori and included planned early docetaxel (yes vs no) and volume of disease (high vs low).

After a median follow-up of 33 months. Overall survival was prolonged by ENZA. At 3 years, 36% NSAA vs 64% ENZA were still on their assigned study treatment. Serious adverse events (regardless of attribution) within 30 days of study treatment occurred in 42% ENZA vs 34% NSAA, commensurate with the different durations of study treatment.

ENZA significantly improved OS when added to SOC in mHSPC while the benefits appeared lower in those planned to receive early DOC.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-13

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): Hospital Chronicles (Nosokomeiaka Chronika), 15(1) 2020

Section

ONCOLOGY CORNER

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).